close
close

Homeless pregnant Kingston abuse victim moved into apartment with blood stains and no crib space

Kingston Council moved a pregnant homeless victim of domestic abuse into an unsuitable studio apartment with blood stains on the wall and no space for a cot, a watchdog investigation has found. It took the authority more than four months to properly house the woman, who was also placed in a mixed dormitory with shared facilities, where she suffered panic attacks.

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman’s report found that the council initially delayed providing Mrs X with emergency housing and then failed to properly consider the suitability of the accommodation provided. The authority agreed to pay him £1,000 as a result of his failings after the ombudsman told him to pay £750 more than he had originally offered.




A council spokesman said it was committed to providing “quality housing for residents” and ensuring they had a “safe and comfortable place to live”. It added that it is supporting almost 1,000 families in temporary accommodation as it faces a national housing crisis, with demand for properties “increasingly outstripping supply”.

READ MORE: Evicted single mum ‘feels hopeless’ after moving between west London hotels for 6 months

Kingston Council said it had since improved its domestic abuse services(Image: Charlotte Lillywhite)

Ms X approached the council as homeless last July and said she was fleeing domestic abuse because her wider family had threatened her because they disapproved of her pregnancy. The authority accepted she was eligible for help, the report said, but failed to properly consider her circumstances and provide emergency accommodation for 17 days.

This meant that Mrs X had to find accommodation herself using another council’s out of hours service on a nightly basis. This was a mixed hostel where she felt unsafe and had panic attacks, according to the report, and chose to sleep on a bench one night because she was so worried.

During this time, a domestic abuse charity asked the council to place Mrs X in emergency accommodation as it said she was at ongoing risk of domestic abuse and that certain areas were unsafe for her because people threatened to kill her. Mrs X provided the council with a statement about the domestic abuse in late July, which did not name the perpetrators.

Ms X called the council repeatedly in early August to ask if it accepted her statement. A legal charity, which also contacted the authority on her behalf, said the council refused to accommodate her unless she provided the names and addresses of the perpetrators, which she failed to do for fear of reprisals.

Related Articles

Back to top button