close
close

Leicester City must remember the lesson of relegation if a tempting £45m move is proposed

As much research as managers do before joining new clubs, whether it’s watching old matches or analyzing statistics, they can’t really come to any conclusions about the players they inherit until they’re on the training ground and train.

That goes for Steve Cooper at Leicester City and Enzo Maresca now at Chelsea. And after a few weeks of the old City boss overseeing his new side in the capital, it has emerged that he wants a new goalkeeper. It’s worrying.




For now, the line is that Maresca likes Robert Sanchez and will install him as Chelsea’s number one this season, but that he wants someone to challenge and push him. And with Mads Hermansen being his first-choice goalkeeper target at City, Maresca will no doubt be telling Chelsea to consider the Dane.

READ MORE: Leicester City get five players back to give Steve Cooper more transfer decisions

READ MORE: Steve Cooper reveals Leicester City’s transfer hopes with more to follow on potential Matias Soule deal

When Maresca moved to Stamford Bridge, Hermansen was at the top of the list of City players expected to be poached, above Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall. Having a goalkeeper who is both talented and composed with the ball at his feet is integral to Maresca’s style of play and he felt, based on the quality of the players he was inheriting versus those he was leaving behind, that Hermansen will give him a slight upgrade. .

So how much would the 24-year-old be worth if Chelsea came calling? A figure emerged at the weekend which explains that City value the Dane at £45m. For those who don’t follow the club closely, this may seem difficult for a goalkeeper who cost just £6.5m a year ago, even though he earned a place in the Championship team of the season.

But City fans might say that’s not enough. Because while there were plenty of lessons to be learned from their latest relegation, one that stands out is how important a good goalkeeper is. In short, it can be the difference between staying up and going down, and that’s worth a lot more than £45m.

Related Articles

Back to top button