close
close

I’m at Eurovision in Sweden and it’s drastically different to Liverpool

It’s hard to believe that the glorious Eurovision fortnight in Liverpool was already a year ago.

A city changing the trajectory of the world’s biggest event may seem like a fever dream, but Liverpool did it – and it may never be replicated. Sweden is socially accepted as the modern home of Eurovision given its penchant for hosting.




Now in its seventh year, tied only with Ireland, the country knows what to expect and SVT, the national broadcaster, knows how to make a show look good. Eurovision fans traveling to Sweden are assured they are in good hands, but expectations were through the roof after the show in Liverpool.

Britain last held the pageant in 1998, so the appetite was there to make a show of it. Liverpool have never been shy about throwing a party, so it really was one for the cards – one of the most successful and acclaimed in the competition’s history, mind you.

READ MORE: I stayed at the hidden place which is perfect for a couple’s retreat

READ MORE: I ate at the restaurant on my way to a Michelin star

The culture team produced a region-wide package including EuroStreet, EuroGrant, EuroFest and EuroLearn, which included funding, school education programmes, parades, performances and an unmistakable Liverpool Eurovision stamp. A host city is only required to produce the television appearance – the fan experience is appreciated but not a contractual obligation. Having said that, Liverpool knocked it out of the park and in my opinion Sweden failed to match it.

The biggest downgrade this year is Eurovision Village. None of the performances in the semi-finals are projected and overall the package is lacking. More than 30 of the scheduled acts pulled out to follow the boycott which left the organizers to perform some acts that even the locals would not have been familiar with. Now, the biggest star will be last year’s runner-up, Kaarija.

Related Articles

Back to top button