close
close

Sutton Council accused of ‘treating residents with contempt’ over incinerator spewing black smoke

Councilors said Sutton Council was “treating residents with contempt” by continuing to support the Beddington incinerator despite fears over previous outages. Opposition councilors have criticized a recent report published by the Environment Agency (EA), which they say downplays the impact of the plant.

The report focuses on the impact of a significant incident last October in which black, acrid smoke billowed from the incinerator’s chimneys. Sutton Labor councilor Dave Tchil was the first person to alert EA to the incident after noticing the smell while cycling to work.




Speaking to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), Tchil said: “The pollution that day was very real, I reported it, I tasted the bitter smoke. Families reported children having breathing and eye problems, and local schools responded to protect the children.”

Read more: South London boroughs are clamoring for better transport ahead of the general election

The Beddington incinerator burns waste in four south London boroughs: Croydon, Sutton, Merton and Kingston(Image: Grahame Larter)

While Viridor, the operators, are responsible for alerting regulators of any outage, it was later revealed that the employee responsible for this was not working that day. The facility, operational since 2019, has now addressed this issue by appointing a deputy.

Finally, the EA undertook an investigation into the causes and potential damage caused by the sour smoke. After six months of pressure from Sutton’s opposition councillors, the EA has finally released its “compliance assessment report” into the blackouts.

During a meeting with Fichtner, who led a third-party investigation into the outages, the councilors were told the cause and extent of the outage. EA classified it as a category 3 incident, “associated with a minor impact on human health, quality of life or the environment”.

The EA also instructed Viridor to take steps to ensure that such outages do not recur in the future. However, Tchill and his independent colleague Tim Foster believe this report was a “whitewash” that tries to downplay the incident.

Related Articles

Back to top button