close
close

The planning row over one of Britain’s most dangerous buildings has been “temporarily” resolved.

Yard owners can continue to store pallets next to one of the country’s most “dangerous” buildings, despite being open for three years, without council permission. Industrial Pallet Solutions, based next to Grade II-listed Langley Maltings in Oldbury, opened in September 2021 but has just received “retrospective” permission from Sandwell Council after a year’s discussion with the authority’s planners and conservation officers.

The firm, which stores, reuses and delivers pallets, moved into the empty yard in Western Road, Oldbury, almost three years ago but only applied for planning permission in March last year. Sandwell’s planners finally came to a decision after a discussion with Industrial Pallet Solutions about the “significance” of Langley Maltings and its current condition, which was badly damaged by fire in 2009.




Sandwell Council said Industrial Pallet Solutions could continue to store wooden pallets and keep the facilities, which include a static caravan, offices and storage space, “temporarily” for five years. Wooden pallets are to be stored two and a half meters from the building referred to as a ‘buffer’ in the deal now approved by council planners.

Read more: Bearwood’s Windsor complex given late-night license despite protests from neighbours

Read more: Block of flats opposite Oldbury school could become new care home

Read more: Housing scheme advances at former Black Country pub turned hot spot

The row began when conservation officers from Sandwell Council said it was “inaccurate” for the pallet storage business to say in its application that the Grade II listed building had “no significance” and the pallet storage next to it “did not caused no concern as it was abandoned.

The council said the storage of wooden pallets against the wall of the former malt house, which had already been badly damaged by fire, caused a “very real” fire risk. The pallet company said it was not trying to “minimize” the building’s historic significance, but pointed out that its current state was “very badly damaged by fire and derelict” and did not have “much aesthetic value”.

Related Articles

Back to top button