close
close

Bad policies, not gender, will cost Harris the presidency

Now that Vice President Kamala Harris is heir-apparent for the Democratic presidential nomination, the next step we’ll see from the left is whipping out the women’s card.

We’ve seen this in numerous other races, including with former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Anytime a female candidate on the left is criticized, progressives complain of a “war on women” and “sexism.” This form of deflection is sexist in its own way — coddling a candidate by claiming she’s not strong enough for democratic scrutiny.

To be sure, we have too many personal attacks generally in our feverish, hyper-polarized political climate, but the brass-tacks truth is Americans don’t care that Harris is a woman, nor should they. If she loses, it will be based on the substance of her terrible policies, her inarticulate communication and her unimpressive record while in office.

It’s also impossible to claim that Harris is a victim of more venomous personal attacks than her opponent, Donald Trump, who literally took a sniper’s bullet during a political rally.

President Joe Biden dropped out, but his dismal political record with Harris remains. Per RealClearPolitics, 68% of Americans say the United States is on the wrong track.

Harris now owns that terrible ratio, especially since she helped orchestrate the effort to deceive the American public into believing that Biden’s cognitive abilities were fine. She will lose because typical Americans have effectively lost thousands of dollars in wages due to the ravages of inflation wrought in part by massive government stimulus spending championed by this administration and, specifically, by Harris. She also owns the terrible results along our southern border.

What’s shocking is that Border Patrol Chief Jason Owens said Harris has not spoken with him since he was appointed in July 2023. Harris also snubbed Owens’ predecessor, never speaking with retired Border Patrol chief Raul Ortiz during his service from August 2021 through June 2023.

She utterly failed on immigration, and now the highest number of people since 2001 told Gallup that the United States needs to curb illegal immigration and we need stronger controls regarding it. Harris will lose because she’s proven her incompetence on immigration, one of the top issues voters say they care about.

In a Daily Beast column titled “America Is Ready for a Black Female President — but Not Kamala Harris,” Keli Goff rightly cites “data showing she underperforms compared to Biden among women and non-Black minorities” and “a recent poll of Black voters in swing states found that Harris polls a couple of points better than Biden — both landing in the 70s, behind former president Barack Obama, whose favorables stand at 90% and whose unfavorables are at 10%. The vice president’s unfavorable among Black voters stand at 22%.”

Goff also cited Harris’ abysmal record of staff turnover, with Harris’ office blistering through a turnover rate of 92% during the last three-and-a-half years, according to a watchdog report by Open the Books published Monday. Goff also notes Harris struggled with high staff turnover during her previous offices and contrasts this with Obama, whose disciplined campaign earned him the nickname “no drama Obama.”

Harris will lose in November because she could not persuade her party to back her during her 2020 cycle’s bid for the White House. She struggled to gain traction during the primary and dropped out of the race before a single ballot was cast, contrasting with another female candidate of color, former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, who lasted longer and actually garnered delegates.

Harris will also lose because she favors a panoply of terrible policies, including job-killing business tax hikes, destroying private health insurance, banning fracking, and slapping a carbon tax on the backs of American families. In short, it won’t be Harris’ sex that voters will reject in November. It will be her destructive ideology and policies.

Carrie Sheffield is a senior policy analyst at Independent Women’s Voice.

Related Articles

Back to top button