Should You Retire to South Dakota?

Seeing Mount Rushmore might already be on your bucket list, but are you retiring to South Dakota? It probably hasn’t occurred to you yet — although maybe it should. South Dakota ranks favorably in terms of cost of living, according to the MERIC index, and there are plenty of other reasons you might want to give it a shot.

Image source: Getty Images.

A few reasons why South Dakota might be appealing

Let’s cut to the chase and talk about taxes. They are a big deal for most retirees.

South Dakota is one of the few states that gives you a break on state income taxes. The state does not tax income from sources such as Social Security, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), or pensions. There’s also no inheritance or estate tax, so you can transfer your money without the government taking a slice.

The cost of living? That’s about 6 percent lower than the national average, according to the World Population Review. Homes are also a solid buy — the typical home price was recently $308,851, about 85 percent of the national average. All in all, South Dakota is easier on the wallet than many other states.

Several cities and towns in South Dakota could be ideal for retirees, so it’s worth exploring them before settling down. Sioux Falls, the state’s largest city, offers plenty of amenities. However, places like Rapid City, Watertown, and Spearfish might be more your speed, depending on the retirement lifestyle you’re after.

It’s not all sunshine, though

If you’re not willing to brave the cold, South Dakota might not be your cup of tea. Winters can be pretty harsh, but if you can hang in there, you’ll be rewarded with scenic views and outdoor activities when the weather is at its best.

Also, keep in mind that South Dakota is largely rural, so amenities and services may be more limited in some areas. Ultimately, you should consider your health care and lifestyle preferences to determine what is best for you.